Hospitals were paid more for Covid-19 cases
Why the US has the highest Covid-19 case count and death count
Legislating a 20% top-up
The CARES Act of 2020 effectively starting handing hospitals money for Covid-19 diagnoses.
When Congress passed the $2.2 trillion dollar economic stimulus bill on March 27, 2020, it included a provision that enhanced the payout that hospitals would get from Medicare by 20% for Covid-19 cases. Medicare is a federal health insurance program mainly for people over 65 years of age. Under section 3710 of the CARES Act, if a patient has a Covid-19 diagnosis and has been administered remdesivir, plasma treatment or baricitinib, the hospital is eligible for an extra 20% payout on top of what Medicare would already cover.
Effectively, if you’re a hospital administrator, your hospital can make more money if you fill your beds with Medicare patients that have Covid-19. Supposing the shrewd administrator devoted a whole wing of their hospital to Covid. Think of the potential numbers of Medicare patients you could fit! Never mind that relegating the remaining fraction of the hospital rooms to accommodating the usual traffic of non-Covid cases could result in overcrowding and understaffing.
A source of mine works as a liaison between hospitals and long-term care homes where she is responsible for filling beds. She says her job is to accept “the right kind of patients” that will result in the most turnover, keeping the care homes profitable. “You’re supposed to try to avoid patients who won’t recover or who might not pay,” she said. She also shared that there was “huge incentive for us to open a Covid-19 ward to alleviate hospitals”. In other words, the long-term care homes need money to stay afloat and the government was offering them money.
Overmagnification of PCR tests to get positive results
In August 2020, a source from St. Michael’s Medical Center in Bremerton, WA, told me that Covid-19 PCR tests were overmagnified, resulting in false positives. In fact, the FDA approved a cycle threshold (where each cycle increases the amplification and magnification of specimen) of up to 35-40 cycles. Yet Dr. Fauci said this on a July 16, 2020 podcast with This Week in Virology:
If you get a cycle threshold of 35 or more…the chances of it being replication-competent are minuscule…you almost never can culture virus from a 37 threshold cycle…even 36…it’s just dead nucleotides, period.
Start at the 4 minute mark. Thanks to Jon Rappoport from “Anti-Empire” for this info (https://anti-empire.com/fauci-himself-admits-covid-pcr-test-at-over-35-cycles-is-deceitful-worse-than-useless/).
The phenomenon of ‘asymptomatic’ cases
In other words, although the FDA said you can magnify up to a cycle threshold of 40, anything over 35 would be picking up dead virus. This resulted in the commencement of “asymptomatic” cases: patients who tested positive but have no symptoms of illness whatsoever. These healthy people were told to go quarantine for 2 weeks or until they have a negative test. If you’ve ever done a science experiment on the 5-second rule of dropping food on the floor, you’ve understood how many nasty germs brush past us on a daily basis. A healthy immune system protects an individual from becoming sick from regular daily contamination. I would venture to guess from my layman’s education that with any other disease it would be unheard of to diagnose someone with a scary illness based on dead nucleotides. Yet the FDA approves the use of PCR tests to diagnose people with Covid-19 who merely have dead nucleotides that cannot replicate and would never make them sick. So those asymptomatic cases? Dead nucleotides that are unable to replicate.
Relevance of this info for Canadians
The over-reporting of Covid-19 cases and deaths is relevant to Canadians because one of the core messages Canadians are hearing is how much better they’re doing than the Americans. The relative comparison gives an impression that Canadians can congratulate themselves for “flattening the curve”, and also serves as an impetus to continue mask mandates, vaccine mandates and blanket infringement on Charter Rights and Freedoms. The relativism feeds the “Do Your Part” memo that has been shoved down Canadians’ throats and attempts to justify mask-wearing, avoiding human interaction and shutting down the economy as reasonable measures in fighting a SARS-Cov virus.
The slow removal of Canadians’ rights
During Christmas of 2020, Canadians were forbidden from celebrating with anyone outside their household. This infringes on the fundamental freedom of peaceful assembly according to the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. On April 23, 2021, British Columbia announced travel restrictions outside of selected zones, with roadblocks, checkpoints and $575 fines. This is in utter opposition to the mobility rights the Charter gives Canadians to enter, leave and travel across Canada. The maritime provinces have had ongoing and varying restrictions that have turned away people from moving there, barred children from visiting their sick mother, stopped cross-border children from going to school and refused unvaccinated Canadians entry without 14-day quarantine. Limiting the citizens’ right of mobility puts Canada in an unsavory class with North Korea and Nazi Germany.
Me enjoying my mobility rights in April 2021
The right to peaceful assembly has also been attacked to the core. What can the Charter Rights mean except that Canadians have the liberty to choose their associations, come what may? A person has the freedom to choose if he wants to go to the home of another. The homeowner has the freedom to choose if she will let that person enter. She can choose if she wants to take risks to gather with a group of other people, be it flu season, bad weather or better judgment. Stopping churches from meeting or any group of people who choose to be together of their own will and accord is unconstitutional.
If you feel that the media’s over-portrayal of risk and lack of investigation into huge hypocrisies has led your government to make bad decisions, look into these things for yourself and write your MLAs or local representatives with fact-based arguments. Stop hiding behind a mask and tell others what you are finding out.
Factually yours,
Leah Taylor
"FDA and others are misusing PCR to achieve false positives. Anything over 26 or 27 produces false positives and they know it. Not to mention that Kary Mullis, who won Nobel Prize for his technique was ADAMANT that it should not be used for testing.
Leah, you lose me to some degree & possibly many others, when you insert religious elements into this matter. This should not be a political or religious matter, this is an issues of hijacked science, & a lack of transparency. It is not Satan or his minions, but it is possibly, even eviler. It is about elitism, selfishness, greed & lust for power & control, all very all too human constructs. Nonetheless, thankyou for your research & power too the people.